Feeds:
Posts
Comments

On occasion, I’ve been to cure my insomnia by reading asinine messages boards on IMDb on movies I like or the talkbacks AiCN for shows I’ve never seen. The amount of work that goes behind some of these posts calms me and brings me to a soothing rest like a child; it is comforting to know that I don’t waste my time arguing on the internet.

Here’s what I read last night, for the batshit movie “Dogville.”

WHERE ARE ALL THE WALLS!?!?!?!

WHERE ARE ALL THE WALLS!?!?!?!

 

 

“Why was Lauren Bacall cast as a townswoman?”

“paralells between grace and britney spears”

“I lost brain cells watching this film *spoilers*”

“An ode to Brechtian/Epic Theatre if I ever saw one”

“[Post Deleted]“

“What’s with the 10 mililons budget?”

“This movie isn’t about the USA. stop being so egocentric”

“What the word pedantic means”

“Old Testament God…New Testament God”

“awww grace, you coulda been my hero”

“This movie scarred me for life”

“what are the alligations?”

“They all deserved it, *spoilers*”

“She sure got raped a lot.”

“I fell asleep 30 minutes before the end, what happened?”

“Romance?”

“I want my money back.”

That is all. Cheers!

Hindsight

The following is a set of questions, ones that I would often pester my parents with when I was younger. This is how I would have responded to these questions, if asked them today.

I. MONEY

Why do we put money into the bank?

We can’t trust ourselves. And those large multinational corporations need to borrow their resources for ravaging the environment/civilized society have to come from somewhere. But mostly, we can’t trust ourselves. It’s safer there.

Why are we driving, not flying to Utah for the family reunion?

Now I’ve told you because it’s more fun, but that’s a lie. We’re too poor to fly. And we want to take you away from your friends for as long as possible.

Why do credit cards work?

So they can take your money before you have it.

Why do you balance your checkbook before you get out of line?

Because only poor people balance their checkbook. I mean smart people.

Can I have that?

Yes, anything you want. (This is also why we are poor.)

II. ANATOMY

What is inside my body?

Disappointment.

Why is my skin this color?

Because my skin is that color. And because I love you.

Can I have another glass milk?

No, you’ve had like eight glasses in a row, it’s starting to creep me out.

Can I see Judge Dredd?

You’d be disappointed, so no. Let’s harbor that illusion that it’s a great film. And it’s rated R, so no.

Aunt Lois, can I have that Korn cd?

No, it’s terrible music. Buy anything else. Anything. (I wonder sometimes what kind of person I would have turned out to be if Lois allowed me to buy Follow the Leader. I shudder.)

Can we ride in a hot-air balloon?

Yes, whenever you want.

III. TOOLS

What does that tool do?

Get out of the way, you’re in my light.

How is a house built?

Uhhh….lots of wood and glass. And a concrete foundation. There’s some carpet in there too. And a television.

Can we have a pet bear?

No. Because even if you buy it when it is a cub, and raise it, and it loves you everyday, and you think it is your best friend, it’ll grow into an adult bear. And then one day, you won’t be his best friend. Then he’ll claw your face off, and you’re dead. I know this. Because it happened to my friend. (This is what my father would tell me when I asked for a bear. Seriously.)

Did Eddie Murphy used to be funny?

If by funny you mean overrated, then yes.

Is god real?

IF YOU ARE!

 

IV. SCHOOL

Why do I have to go to school?

The state makes you go, so when you enter adult society, you aren’t a complete idiot. That and so you aren’t sitting around the house all day while I am trying to sit around the house all day, in private.

Why do I have to do well in school?

Here’s how the public school system works: If you excel in the public school system you will be rewarded with more opportunities and privileges to help you excel in the university system, and once you excel there you can excel in whichever system you choose to enter after, be it business, medicine, law or vampirism. If you can do it the first time, you can do it the rest of your life. The reward for this monotonous thinking? Money!  Yes, son, you’ll make a shit-ton of money in the hypothetical future. Yes, that green stuff in my wallet, and that big number on those receipts my wallet is filled with. That can all be yours, unless you die in a tragic accident before that. But with money you can buy larger and more extravagant stuff than regular old poor people and generally be considered a bigger success. And the bigger the success you are, the better the person you are. It’s known as Worthington’s Law. Never heard of it?

You can excel in every system by following the same ways to succeed in high school. 

1) Don’t backtalk.

2) If they’re older than you, then they’re worth your admiration and respect. Bend over backwards to learn from this person and/or let them torture you. Never call them by their first name. (This is why frats/businessmen refer to their esteemed elders by their last names/nicknames. First names are disrespectful to teachers.)

3) If you don’t think you can do it by your own means, cheat.

4) Don’t stand out until right before your imminent, albeit fleeting, victory. Then reap all the praise.

5) Participate in extracurricular activities.

6) Don’t backtalk.

7) Neglect development of critical reasoning skills and refine your ability to excel at standardized methods of tests.

So shut up and do your homework and get ready for that WASL. Unless you want to be an artist/poor.

Do grades matter?

Yes, unless you intend on getting high and playing video-games for the rest of your life. Grades mostly sort out the cattle without having to examine the goods too closely.

Why do we study history? It already happened.

So you don’t make the same mistakes they did. Like communism. (What my parent’s actually said.)

Why can’t I use the computers in the classroom?

Because they’re made out of cardboard and taffy. And you could break it.

Can you help me with my homework?

Just let me do it for you. You could screw it up.

Why did I see my two girl teachers kissing?

Because they’re free now.

Twelve months of the year, Hollywood releases a bunch of crappy movies designed to make money. The last two or three months, though still filled with crap, also have a significant amount of prestigious films, that cost the same bloated amount. It is often acceptable for these films to gross significantly less than their peers – ah, the privilege of art! Anyway, Hollywood has the Oscars to increase the mainstream visibility of these films. The more nominations, the better your film is. Now us arty snobby types are aware of these films throughout the year – from the casting to the production to the festival release- it is pretty easy to guess who or what is getting nominated in about July. But after Christmas, when the real shit dump of January and Febuary begins, as well as the nominations, studios pump more advertising money into these prestige films so  more regular folks go and see them (Would anyone in Kansas drag their husbands to see Milk unless it was Oscar nominated?) This whole fun cycle exists so these films aren’t complete failures, and studios can claim a higher purpose to excuse things like Kangaroo Jack. This is how the blood sucking leeches at Miramax operated for twenty-five years. Sucking up independent films that they know they could milk during this season, and remaining a Best Picture producing machine. How am I aware of this vast conspiracy? I read Entertainment Weekly for nine years in my adolescence. You just kind of figure out that the Weinstein’s climbed out of some flaming hellhole around 1978 after three or so years of following the industry.

But don’t worry, this isn’t going to be a big rant about the industry and my numerous subsuming conspiracy theories. Lord no! I was just providing you some necessary background on my position before belaboring you wiiiiiiiiiith- an Oscar Prediction piece! First I will tell you, who should win, and then I will tell you who will in. Sometimes they are one and the same. Let’s get STARTED!

Best Supporting Actress

  • Amy Adams in “Doubt” (Miramax)
  • Penélope Cruz in “Vicky Cristina Barcelona” (The Weinstein Company)
  • Viola Davis in “Doubt” (Miramax)
  • Taraji P. Henson in “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” (Paramount and Warner Bros.)
  • Marisa Tomei in “The Wrestler” (Fox Searchlight)
  •  Let’s thin this annual crap-shoot out right off the bat. Cruz and Davis have no chance. Cruz could’ve won for Volver, and the Academy rarely rewards Allen’s work these days. I have no idea who Viola Davis is, and I don’t feel like wikipediaing the plot of Doubt and pretending to you that I have seen it (I won’t do that with any movie.) I haven’t seen it. I’m not interested in paying too much at the theatre. This speaks poorly to the movies chances in this category and most others . I don’t need to speak about Amy Adams then. This leaves Tomei and Henson.

    Tomei has a decent shot, though Jack Palance has already rewarded her with one statuette. I still wish he gave that award to Billy Crystal or Daniel Stern or even Jon Lovitz! Personally, I loved The Wrestler. It was the best movie I have seen all year. Unfortunately, these kind of films are usually rewarded with acting awards, instead of Best Picture awards. Tomei wasn’t really too memorable in the film,  but her character provided a necessary balance and longing for the script to truly work- and for the last ten minutes to be as powerful as they were. I actually preferred her scenes outside of the strip club, and I am a big fan of Marisa Tomeis tits. (Ever seen Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead? Except for the first three minutes – don’t. Awful film.) 

    This award shouldn’t go to the best actress in a supporting role, the overacting woman who’s third billed or whatever, but to the person who makes the film itself better, and not her visibility in it. That would obviously be Tajari P. Henson. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button hinged on his adoptive mother caring for him, it needed someone to truly care for the movie to escape from the first act. Henson did all that and more – she was the emotional core of the movie until Blanchett’s character became more prominent. I was more pained by her characters outcome than anyone else.

    Who Should Win – Henson

    Who Will Win – Adams

    Best Supporting Actor

  • Josh Brolin in “Milk” (Focus Features)
  • Robert Downey Jr. in “Tropic Thunder” (DreamWorks, Distributed by DreamWorks/Paramount)
  • Philip Seymour Hoffman in “Doubt” (Miramax)
  • Heath Ledger in “The Dark Knight” (Warner Bros.)
  • Michael Shannon in “Revolutionary Road” (DreamWorks, Distributed by Paramount Vantage)
  • Hoffman is out, same reason as above. I’ve heard from everyone that Shannon may be the best thing in anything all year, but it scares me Road only has this one nomination, and I’d be surprised if he siphoned enough votes from you-know-who. I really dug Brolin as Dan White, he gave the character more depth than the documentary did, and that wasn’t because of Van Sant. I would be satisfied if he walked away with this. Downey Jr., he was hilarious in Tropic Thunder (My girlfriend and I still rehash the “Full Retard” scene,) and this wasn’t even his best performance of the year. But this isn’t a typical comedy rewarding category. Especially in a year with one heavy favorite.

    Ledger’s performance went above and beyond. It made the movie into something more than a supherhero/action movie. It didn’t sugarcoat anarchist the way V For Vendetta did. I watched this film more than twice simply to rewatch Ledger.  The Academy always rewards method acting, and actors who do something especially big to prepare for the role – losing gaining a significant amount of weight, changing their physical appearance, being a bad guy for once, not going Full Retard but definetley part retard. It’ll be interesting to see if the Academy will go as far to “reward” an actor who got so into the role that he locked himself into a hotel room for weeks, did a shit-ton of drugs (presumably) and died. The academy is in a situation without precedent- do they reward the guy who played the Joker, when, as I posit, that playing the Joker killed the guy? Whatever happens, I hope Michelle Williams isn’t at the performance, or at least they are nice enough to leave the camera off of her whenever the obligatory mention(s) happen. And a final food for thought: What would have the reaction been like if Ledger died in a similar situation at a time considerably later than the release, instead of considerably before. It is irrefutable that his death increased the hype for the film as well as the performance. Everyone will pay to watch a ghost walk. I wonder if the praise would have been so immediate and unanimous.

    Who Should Win – Ledger

    Who Will Win – Ledger

    Best Actress

  • Anne Hathaway in “Rachel Getting Married” (Sony Pictures Classics)
  • Angelina Jolie in “Changeling” (Universal)
  • Melissa Leo in “Frozen River” (Sony Pictures Classics)
  • Meryl Streep in “Doubt” (Miramax)
  • Kate Winslet in “The Reader” (The Weinstein Company)
  •  Hathaway has a shot, but her buzz waned, then completely died, after Bride Wars. I can’t even consider Jolie as anything more than a movie star, that the and the fact that I have an allergy to Eastwood directed films, all indulgent, serious-in-dark-tones crap to me, doesn’t really help her case. That and the fact it came out in July. And it’s called Changeling. It sounds like an album title by some crappy indie rock band.

    Never heard of Leo or Frozen River. Meryl Streep has enough nominations and awards, in that movie I haven’t seen. She could win. She’s fucking Meryl Streep, right? Anyway, Winslet has been nominated and lost unjustly too many times, but then again the Academy has never been a bastion or purveyor of what is just or right in the world. But it’s her time. And everyone would love to reward a Nazi turned cougar. At least I would.

    Who Should Win – Winslet

    Who Will Win- Winslet

    Best Actor

    • Richard Jenkins in “The Visitor” (Overture Films)
    • Frank Langella in “Frost/Nixon” (Universal)
    • Sean Penn in “Milk” (Focus Features)
    • Brad Pitt in “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” (Paramount and Warner Bros.)
    • Mickey Rourke in “The Wrestler” (Fox Searchlight)  

    This is probably the only close (and interesting) race in the whole crop this year. I’m throwing Langella out of the running because he’s doing something tough. 1) He’s playing a role he has already done on stage, which was garnered which critical attention and awards already. 2) He’s playing a historical character, one already subject to much political scrutiny, but already exposed to sufficient film time as well whether he has been on the screen or off of it (All The President’s Men, Dick, Nixon.) 3) He’s in a Howard movie. I hate Howard movies. They are all resolutely over-praised without a significant amount of substance. And yes, I am including A Beautiful Mind. Once you find out that dude is imaginary, shit all goes downhill. And I don’t care if I spoiled that movie, it isn’t worth your time. The only reason Crowe won the Oscar for Gladiator is because everyone knows he should’ve won for The Insider. That was the only reason he won. Yes, this shit is all cyclical. People get awarded Oscars to remedy previous injustices, and in doing so, current nominees get screwed only to get remedied later on, screwing those later hypothetical nominees. It’d be a lot easier to give the award to the person who did the best job in their performance that year, instead of whoever “deserves” it. Am I making any sense? So ANYWAY, Langella won’t win. I don’t remember why, but it might be because it grossed like half a million dollars the weekend before the Oscars, and the guy playing Frost creeps the shit out of me. Not good. Bottom line: Fuck Ron Howard. But: I like Frank Langella. He’s the man in Dave.  

    ANYWAY, the other nominees. Pitt was good in Button, but the make-up did most of the acting. And unfortunately, he may have the same problem as Jolie, as being seen constantly as a movie star instead of an actor. It was only 3/4 of the way through when I started thinking, “What’s going to happen to Brad Pitt?” instead of “What’s going to happen to Benjamin Button?” Don’t see this one happening. I have my hopes for Jenkins, I am a big SFU fan, and I just watched this one last night with my girly. Jenkins is phenomenal. Jenkins brings a nerdy life, and understandable distance to this character that makes what he goes through understandable. It’s regrettable that this film is awarded merely with the nomination for actor, as surprising it may have been to most people, when the writing and directing of Tom McCarthy is as good if not better. Bottom line:  He was the character out of this list that I cared the most about.

     

    This leaves the two heavyweights: Penn and Rourke.

    I’ll start with Penn. The Life and Times may be hands down my favorite documentary ever. Regardless to say tempered my expectations, and actually decided to see the movie, under my girlfriends wise guidance to hold my judgment until I see it, and appreciate it as a seperate piece of art, yada yada yada, and I did that, and I seriously enjoyed the film. But something about Penn bothered me. The performance itself was fantastic, but the overall conception of the portrayal, as sort of cutsey and sunshine and smiles, sort of betrayed the work Milk himself did. And this isn’t Penn’s fault by any means, so I shouldn’t hold against his performance. The best way to state my feelings was written in a Newsweek review in November. (http://www.newsweek.com/id/171189) Paraphrased: Van Sant does not have rage in his color palette. Perfectly stated. To portray the life of Harvey Milk, there needs to be rage in his loss, anger at the failure of the system he changed, there needs to be something that happens when he dies besides a fucking candlelit march, regardless of how sweet it is. They sterilized the power of his death by bringing it up right away, which also worked to it’s favor, people who were unaware weren’t surprised, and people who were aware were not waiting for it. But ultimately it hurts the story, that what happened with White is delegated to the denouement and then credits roll. This only supports the failure of the system by not highlighting it as well as the documentary did. It may be unfair to compare the two, but the film would not exist, at least with A-List Hollywood players, without the documentary. And all this hurts Sean Penn, at least in my snobby judgmental opinion.

    This leaves Rourke. Enough has been said about him. A transformation. Redemption. Wonderful. A performance for the ages. Lots of hyperbole. He’s good. The movie is better. But he wounded the industry with his choices earlier in his career. And the Oscars are more of a celebration of the industry than it is a celebration of great performance and films. Don’t be shocked if Rourke’s comeback film (Not Sin City, hehe,) is rewarded with the nomination and subsequent supporting role in a prestigious film offers. I’m not saying it should happen, but don’t be shocked. But everyone loves a comeback story. And see the film if you haven’t, especially on the big screen. Even if you aren’t an adolescent wrestling nut. It’s always good to see the Blue Meanie still getting work.

    Who Should Win – Jenkins/Rourke

    Who Will Win – Penn

    Best Director

    • David Fincher – The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    • Opie Cunningham – Frost/Nixon
    • Danny Boyle – Slumdog Millionaire
    • Stephen Doyle – The Reader
    • Gus Van Sant – Milk

    If they fork the statuette to Boyle for his totally medicore feel-good gangsteresque film, people are going to be surprised when a bunch of white dudes walk onto for a “foreign” film (it’s British, member!) which many people mistakenly think is a genuine Bollywood flick, and was financied, produced and totally genuinely Indian, lots of people will feel cheated. Which they kind of should. Boyle is totally banking off these cute kids, and manipulating the global feel of the film to make it something unique. Which it isn’t. I liked it alright, but it didn’t really take any chances. There is some mundane symbolism, and a brief conversation could be had afterwards regarding fate vs. coincidence, which is really just an exchange about three phrases long, and that one girl is very hot, which is all it really takes to win Best Director, I guess. And too many cuts and fuzzy angles. In that case the award should really go to the director of Cloverfield. I am dead serious. And I like(d?) Danny Boyle. But that may because I have never seen The Beach. I don’t really like British people honestly for that matter. Except for Stephen Frears. ANWYAY.

    This one should and will go to Fincher. It was genuinely artistic, and not like some slobbering half-retarded dog trying to be artistic, it just simply was. It was beautifully shot, but that may be the reward to the cinematographer, it must be nominated, I’m not even going to check. Basically if you’ve seen it, you know what I’m talking about. Best movie I have seen in years. I’m actually going to buy it on DVD, which is something I NEVER do. It doesn’t hurt that I have loved everything Fincher has made. Except Zodiac. Ugh.

    Best Picture

    • The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
    • Frost/Nixon
    • Slumdog Millionaire
    • The Reader
    • Milk

    Milk is out of the running according to my reasons above, same with Slumdog Millionaire, a truly average film that people will fucking realize in a few years. Frost/Nixon is an adaptation of a play based on an interview, and the Opie factor nixes it, he makes shit. This leaves The Reader and Button. Reader is too dark and sexy, like everything Winslet does now, thank god, to be rewarded here if at all. It’s Button baby, the only movie with a memorable message that could remain entertaining for nearly three hours. It’s damn  old-fashioned unpretentious American art. It’ll lose probably because people aren’t excited about Milk anymore, and because people eat up Slumdog because people are stupid/not as critical and smarmy as me.

    Should Win – Button

    Will Win – Milk /Slumdog

    griffey doesn’t suck, jack z doesn’t suck maybe made a poor long-term choice, beer doesn’t suck, wine kind of sucks, tequila rules, super mario all-stars rocks, the nfl still blows a bag of cocks, the nba doesn’t suck, the nba trade deadline doesn’t suck, tyson chandlers toe sucks, a-rod sucks, yankees suck, a-rod’s cousins check bounced, that sucks, michael chabon doesn’t suck, neil gaiman doesn’t suck, futurama “benders game” final 1/4 sucked but the rest definitely didn’t suck, laundry sucks, michael cera sucks, abc sucks, missing lost sucks, mickey rourke’s chihuahua sucks, eric holder rocks and that was YESTERDAY komo-4 that he said that, not today. obama is hot but so far as a president he sucks, the economy sucks, my job doesn’t suck, sonic nurse doesn’t suck, steve earle doesn’t suck, big country sucksl, kanye west definitely sucks, lil’ wayne sucks when he isn’t “performing.” burning your thumb with a blow-torch sucks, puncture wounds from lead pencils kind of sucks. the bachelors marketing team sucks, all television dramas (except lost assumedly,) suck. not having coffee sucks. bellevue sucks. nice hotel rooms on valentines day DOESN’T suck, pike place fish fry doesn’t suck, sean penn kind of sucks, emile hirsch rocks, drive-by-truckers suck, dead girls in the barracks at fort lewis is…alright? no wait it sucks. falling down the stairs sucks. lebron james and nate robinson rock. dirk nowitzki and ray allen suck. racquetball doesn’t suck.

    I am warming up the water

    To the concept of getting warm.

    I dunk my wrists in,

    The water is getting cold.

    Can you hear me?

    You invisible soul.

    The world is getting brighter.

    My haircuts better than

    The one I woke up with.

    The streets are lifeless

    But full of light.

    The windows are good for leering,

    As long as you have the sight.

    I am happy,

    I am whole,

    And I am young,

    And the only place I have to go is home.

    Since the doctors

    Pulled the lids off of my eyes,

    Things tend to shift together

    Movement blurred in a disguise,

    Those evil numbers,

    I have burned on my lips,

    Only help me stumble

    Into the freezing water in my basin.

    What I know is that

    Any writer can be a poet,

    Too bad that street only moves in one direction.

    The Question

    My father, his mouth, agape, his jaw slack, is just as spry as the day I met him. Which was about a week ago. Over the phone. This is the first time I’ve laid  eyes on him. His head looks like an aged pear, weathered and bruised,and topped with occasional tufts of brown locks, mostly above his forehead and below his nose. A bit of bloody steak, hoisted upon his tongue, the vessel of flavor towards the edge, there’s bits of lettuce and bristle stuck between his teeth, augmenting the whole view, it looks like the ivy at Wrigley. He closes his lips, filled with divots and drags, and presses his gum’s upon the inside of his lip, pushing each pinch and pouch upon the surface of his tongue, he is extracting every bit of flavor from the cow, as if he went into the kill-floor himself.  He smiles in there as he approaches the cow, like it was his own cow, Bessie, cherished, and relishing when the blood met his gloved fingers. That is how my father eats steak.

    His nose stands like a monolith, a mecca for all the other facial features to pray towards. His beady eyes are distanced by this protruding and unfortunate of features, he looks like a toucan mixed with a vulture, thin, bulbous and harvesting. His other features aren’t quite so large, maybe their normalcy exaggerates the nose. I think it’s because his hair looks like hair, his ears look like ears, and his chin is  non-descript, plain and ending.

    His eyes aren’t  unique, but merely provide his face with a deepening quality. They exude complete patience and control. Anything unplanned or unexpected couldn’t startle them, much less make them blink. He must’ve been a terror on the courtroom.  Which would explain the size and quality of his house. His garage is about the size of my condo.  And I can’t tell if that is a compliment or an insult yet.

    Personally, I haven’t seen anyone age, so I’m not quite sure where he’s at in the process, and whether or not this is good or bad, for someone nearly seventy years old. He pushes his plate and napkin aside, and waves for his  servant, a slim and immediate man who also has a protruding bulge himself, his streak emerges from the middle of his back rather than the middle of his face, and he is a hunchback by any classical or realistic definition. I’ve made a note not to stare at his severe kyphosis.

    Vlash functions as a victim of his body, a concept his master could never quite understand. From this first encounter I have come to believe that he actively commands and dictates with his inner voice the actions of each his organs, that they consult with some small place in his brain, I guess you could call it a liaison, regarding whether it is acceptable to secrete this fluid, or mingle with this blood pathogen or germ or whatever it is that moves around in our organs. They are truly his, and not just a part of him. But now, he may be yielding this control, because his body seems to be catching up with the indeterminable distance set by his age. He has graying, but not thinning hair. He sometimes complains about certain joints or organs that are giving him trouble, often preceded with an empathetic expletive. He uses a cane, but this is uncommon, and private and painful, and only among those we would classify as his “Circle of Trust.” I’m not sure if I am one of these people yet. The cane is more of a rumor than a fact to me right now, I spotted it in the back of the closet, I only knew to look for it due to information from secretive and confidential telephone conversations with his butler, who is very polite and of Nordic heritage and surprising with his ease to share usually secretive information. Expectations only lead to confusion, the ancestor of disappointment.

    His age is merely a number, an illusion, an impression. Just as his skin is just an appearance, an illusion, an impression. His skin is only skin.  I  base on facts on an appearance, an illusion, impressions. Not as a summation of these points and spots, but a collection dispersed,  gullible and pining for more.

    “What was it that you wanted to see me about?”

    “I wanted to ask you why you left my mother and I.”

    “I didn’t.” His tone quickly decimates the poignancy of my question. I’ve been waiting twenty years to confront him, to exploit the melodrama, like a scene in some very meaningful film I’ve been watching in my head, and then tells me straight-away it didn’t happen. The nerve of some people.

    “But you were with my mother, I know you are my biological father, I have the paperwork…”

    “Your mother insinuated that our cohabitation was equivalent to a life-long commitment. If I gave your mother a quarter, she would insinuate that I would bankroll every endeavor she could imagine for the rest of her life. I left. People leave.”

    “But why did you leave us?”

    “Well technically….Adam,”

    “Andrew.”

    “Right, sorry Andrew. Right Andy, like I was going to say, technically, I didn’t leave you. I didn’t know you existed, or were going to exist, based on your definition of the start of life. Either way, I was clueless. You aren’t a bastard, so you can get over that little identity crisis straightaway. If I knew you were going to come, I would’ve stayed. Simple as that. I’m a lawyer, not a monster Adam.”

    “Andy. I mean, Andrew.”

    “Right, Andy.”

    “Well my mother always told me that you knew about me, and that you just didn’t care.”

    “That’s terrible. Why would she say a thing like that. Why didn’t she lie to you?”

    “I don’t…”

    “It seems like she’s taking some undue anger out on you, that was reserved for me. She made you think there was some reason for a father to hate his own child. Why wouldn’t she just have told you I didn’t exist for awhile until you were old enough to handle it, instead of training you to hate me? Your mother was a terrible parent if this was the kind of parenting she did.” He started coughing and pulled a cigarette out of the pack. He offered me one. I waved the offer away.

    “So, why are you here again?”

    “Well, I mostly came to confront you.”

    “That was baseless. And not to mention dumb. What was your game plan after that?”

    “I didn’t really have one. I was going to play it by ear.” He had me there. He justly rolled his eyes and snapped his neck beck and exhaled a cloud of smoke.

    “Your mother should’ve taught you better. Always have a plan.”

    “That’s the sort of thing I imagined my father would’ve taught me. Where were you by the way. You did know about me didn’t you?”

    “I did know of the concept of you. But frankly, I didn’t believe it. When your mother called to tell me about you…shit, what was it… seven years after you were born, she had to remind me of who she was. And that was a bad start. How could she adequately convince me that I was the father of this imaginary child if I had to be reminded just of who the mother was. She wasn’t the only Helen you know. She had to think of something specific to remind me of which one she was. And not very many women have two birthmarks there.”

    “You can stop there with that.”

    “Oh, sorry. Anyway. I didn’t believe. What would take seven years to stop this phone call, you know what I mean? If she really wanted me to be a part of your life, she could’ve called when she found out, could’ve called when she gave birth, could’ve called before your first birthday, could’ve called before you become fully conscious of who you were and figured out that not everyone just had a mom. I mean, really. Seven fucking years. After I gathered it was her, I figured she was trying to gouge me for more money, a pursuit of hers from the start. I don’t think she even liked me that much, I think she just liked my cars and my clothes, but not me. That’s why we fought. Because she didn’t love me. Why do you think it took so long for her to remind me of just who she was. So I left. It was nothing personal.”

    “I never thought of it that way.”

    “I wouldn’t expect you to.”

    We caught up. He isn’t the devil my mother portrayed him to be, or at least she exaggerated the parts that were vulnerable. My mother wasted her talents, because she had a way of accentuating the bad and cutting out the good. If she had her values straight she could’ve been an accomplished artist. He walked me through his house, the hallways had various pictures of his past, him standing in front of fighter planes chomping on a cigar, him sitting on the edge of battleships, pictures of him taking pictures and smiling, young  and strong, vibrant with taut skin. Pictures of him on boats, in deserts, standing in front of important looking buildings posing with important looking people, important looking smiles impressed upon their faces. There is a picture of him with a president, but I’m not sure which one.

    I was compelled to ask his age, but I figured that wasn’t a good decision, especially on a first date. The way I see it his age is merely a number, an illusion, an impression. A spot, a point woven into his definition. Just as his skin, or his occupation is just an appearance, an illusion, an impression. Another point or spot in that thickening weave. His skin is only skin, something I could destroy or mix with something else, like any other chemical property. However, I am a member of the unfortunate ones who tend to base judgment on an appearance, on illusion, on impressions. Worse yet these appearances are not summation of these points and spots, but more like a collection of the appearances, like the coins in your pockets with a total you’re entirely unsure of. They are dispersed and intangible, lined up in a single file, one after the other like pieces in a jumbled alphabet asking for their name, and gullible, pining for more.

    We made plans to have some sort of father son outing and he handed me his phone number, folded on a small slip of yellow paper. “Burn it right after you memorize,” he whispered to me. Later on, I would discover that he had begun to believe, with little reason, that he was a former man of espionage, a figure of great political intrigue. A spy. That everything he was doing was of great value to some faceless communist or anarchist, that his home phone number, which was listed in the phone book, was sensitive material. He was wrong. He was a lifetime upper-middle class lawyer, who was briefly an upper-upper class lawyer,  who spent his life and career in the Midwestern United States. I guess gullible is a family thing.

    Update

    I haven’t updated the site in a little while due to certain things. I’ve nixed writing poetry for the most part- don’t act so disappointed. Mostly doing essays and fiction for now, expository stuff y’know. I’m working on something big for my contract with school, and the bad news none of that stuff is going to appear on How Far is Ohio as it stands. The other portion of my contract however does entail me creating a new blog as an outlet for my “exploratory essays” concerning my adventures in teaching myself how to cook. That is the good news. I’m also reading All The Pretty Horses and giving TM a shot. Okay, talk to you soon internet.

    Here’s the blog:

    culinarylingus.wordpress.com

    saturday mornings

    sometimes days come without an ending
    you don’t sleep where you awoke
    sometimes there’s a someday or a maybe
    that comes to a life in the basement of your home

    when they said this was the new year
    did they mean time wouldn’t be indifferent anymore?
    there ain’t no difference between what’s said on sunday morning
    and what we hear on saturday morning cartoons
    maybe there’s a wall up in heaven
    that is keeping out all the bad things.

    i hold a gun that shoots apologies
    i saw the fire that breaks out at noon
    the simplest things always get so complicated
    why can’t the complications untangle with the moon.

    maybe dreams are when shattered rocks turn into diamonds,
    maybe coming home late is early, too soon.
    maybe what  happened on a saturday morning,
    is lost with the diamonds in the dune.

    we can’t wish for things that have happened
    thats why other grass is always green
    maybe we’re trying to figure out if what happened
    was really right with our memory of should have been.

    we don’t dance in the morning,
    we just pull up the sheets.
    every room is so damn cold on a saturday morning,
    and the newspaper doesn’t talk about my dream.

    the life electric

    crooked reminders of salted things,

    occasions, parties, good songs, long drives

    hands held as eyes meet the (our) horizon

    toes curled on lousy living room carpets,

    stinking belligerent thoughts,

    wafts in the darkness,

    war on headlines, brushed into the corner,

    arrows pointing down, bent and battered in our recycling bin

    the air breathes, and memorizes, itself,

    words write themselves on crooked bent wrists,

    coming alive, appearing like a ufo on a lonely field,

    what a livened force, the is,

    to appear, to breathe, to to, to be,

    meaninglessness?

    confused ingratitude

    I breathe, I take, I give

    careful not to memorize,

    I soak in the life electric,

    pasted on a straight uniform pieces of bread,

    regimented ridges,

    salted things.

    fortunes smile, a lovers smile, the eyes smile, the earths smile

    They appear, like a child, innocent

    and beaming color.

    the giants suck. eli manning sucks. jake delhomme really sucks, especially on his birthday. the cardinals are alright. i don’t really give a shit about anything in pennsylvania. 24 was alright, getting kind of shark jumping area. miss the sonics. dwayne wade doesn’t suck. facebook definitely sucks. books are good. graham greene is very good. rilke is still the best. the color yellow sucks. angels in america is hopefully good. the dark knight and a nap might be best. animal collectives new album doesn’t suck. friend opportunity has lots of horns, surprising. first day of session! dogs kind of suck, the ones that jump in my lap and hit my balls definitely suck. cats still don’t suck, they are awesome. deaf cats though really suck. brewing is good, waiting sucks. gasoline sucks. paying for food sucks, still don’t get that one. missing lost will suck, watching on the internet will really suck. senses are still good. super mario bros and tequila is very fun. not taking the bus doesnt suck. unsure about actually taking the bus. the price of hop really sucks. nolan still sucks. seattle kind of sucks. olympia doesn’t suck (today) the weather in washington doesn’t suck today (interpretive). shearwater doesn’t suck. discovery channel definitely sucks, especially man vs mild. pure suckage. tv sucks. being unable to spell “definitely” sucks, the word “doesn’t” looks really fucked up right now. most movies suck, some don’t. newsweek kind of sucks. georgey bush was funny this morning, that didn’t suck. barack obama doesn’t suck (yet, lots of suckage potential.) israel sucks the fattest of all, palestine doesn’t suck, but their status does suck. jerry jones sucks. mangenius doesn’t suck. brett farve sucks. durant doesn’t suck, okc sucks. time sucks. space doesn’t suck. tom waits wins everything. death sucks.

    « Newer Posts - Older Posts »